Canon Vs. Nikon – 1st person shooter for my Photography nerds.

Eschatological Chart from Kim Riddlebarger

Thanks to Robert Lira for creating a very useful chart of the two age model of New Testament eschatology.

The chart is available as a pdf in both color (Click here for color chart) and black and white (Click here for black and white version).

ht: riddleblog

Understanding the Old Testament – It’s still about Christ.

ht: Z

ETS goodie – Moo on John Frame’s Doctrine of the Christian Life

I was present when Doug Moo reviewed this book at ETS in 2009, and if my memory serves me correctly Moo was filling in for someone… just can’t remember who:

It was a notable moment at ETS that year and though I do respect Moo’s thoughts, click here to read the review that Andy posted.

Douglas J. Moo. Review of John M. Frame, The Doctrine of the Christian Life. 61st Annual Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society. New Orleans, November 2009.

Moo’s conclusion:

The book is an admirable, biblically rich, and very satisfying exploration of the meaning, implications, and practical contemporary outworking of biblical law through the lens of the Decalogue. I learned a lot from it. I was challenged in my own too often superficial level of Christian obedience. And it is an important counterbalance to those who err on the side of turning Christian ethics into a vacuous and undefined call to love one another. But at the end of the day, by not focusing enough attention on the grand New Testament themes of Christ’s lordship, the work of the Holy Spirit, and the transformation of mind and heart in conformity with Christ, the book did not satisfy me as a whole and balanced description of the Christian life.

HT: Andy Naselli

Best Flash Mob I’ve ever seen. Some Christmas Love.

Not your average flash mob.

Some Bahnsen Lectures for FREE!

via: The Domain for Truth

Van Tilian Apologetics, Part 1 of 4

Greg Bahnsen | Jan 01, 1994 | 1 Peter 3:15-16 | Category: Courses
Van Tilian Apologetics, Part 2 of 4

Greg Bahnsen | Jan 01, 1994 | Category: Courses
Van Tilian Apologetics, Part 3 of 4

Greg Bahnsen | Jan 01, 1994 | Colossians 2:3-4 | Category: Courses
Van Tilian Apologetics, Part 4 of 4

Greg Bahnsen | Jan 01, 1994 | Category: Courses

2011 Lego Year in Review

Occupy Wall St.From the Occupy movement, the royal wedding, riots, and protests, this year has been filled with its fair share of incredible events. So much has happened, in fact, that The London Guardian asked the Flickr community to help document some of the highlights of 2011 with those iconic plastic bricks or legos. Now come with us as we take a fun walk down memory lane, thanks to some highly creative individuals…


Charlie Sheen Gets Fired from Two and a Half Men


The Royal Wedding of Kate Middelton and Prince William


Obama and National Security Team Wait to Hear About Osama Bin Laden Raid


Rupert Murdoch Trials


UK Riots


Fighting in Libya


Hosts New Zealand beat France in the final of the Rugby World Cup


11/11/11


The Passing of Steve Jobs


California Cop Pepper Sprays Student Protestors

The News in Lego 11 Flickr page

Some thoughts on Van Til and a free e-book from him.

Chances are if you are reading this blog you’ve already seen this post by JT, but in case you whizzed by it in your reader I’ll draw your attention to it again. Here is JT’s post on John Frame’s thoughts, and I concur (for the free e-book skip to the bottom):

John Frame says that Reformed theologian and philosopher Cornelius Van Til (1895-1987) “is perhaps the most important Christian thinker since Calvin.”

Frame offers several qualifiers to his provocative claim:

To say that Van Til is the most important Christian thinker of our time is not to say that he is the most comprehensive thinker, or the clearest, or the most persuasive.

Certainly it is not to say (as some of his more fanatical followers assume) that he is beyond criticism.

Nor is it to say that he has had a greater impact on present-day Christian thought than anybody else; indeed, his isolation continues, and his influence remains relatively small.

So what does he mean?

It is, rather, to say that he has made the Christian community aware of its only appropriate epistemology, thus laying a necessary foundation that ought to be the basis for all subsequent Christian reflection.

To explain, Frame compares Van Til with the most important philosopher of the modern period, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Frame points out that Kant argued for the autonomy of the human mind—that the human mind is its own ultimate authority and the author of its own moral standards.

Frame writes:

Kant saw, of course, that none of this could be proved in the usual sense of proof. He adopted what he called the “transcendental method,” which seeks to determine the necessary preconditions or presuppositions of rationality. He reached his conclusions concerning human autonomy not by proving them by the usual philosophical methods, but by showing our need to presuppose them. Kant’s philosophy, therefore, does not merely assert or assume human autonomy, as did many previous philosophers; it explicitly presupposes human autonomy. It adopts human autonomy as the root idea to which every other idea must conform. That is what makes Kant unique and vastly important: he taught secular man where his epistemology must begin, his inescapable starting point for all possible reflection.

In other words, Kant

showed “modern man,” secular, would-be autonomous man, what he would have to presuppose about knowl­edge and the world in order to be consistent with his presumed autonomy. In other words, Kant made the modern sectarian “epistemologically self-conscious.” If modern man is not to bow to God, he must bow before himself; to that extent at least, he must be a Kantian.

How does this relate to Van Til?

If Kant taught the world of secular unbelief the essentials of its own (until then, subconscious) theory of knowledge (“epistemology”), Van Til did the same thing for the Christian.

As Kant said that we must avoid any trace of the attitude of bowing before an external authority, so Van Til taught that the only way to find truth at all is to bow before God’s authoritative Scripture.

As Kant presented his view transcendentally, as the inescapable ultimate presupposition of human thought, so Van Til made and defended transcendentally the same claim for the revelation of God: that God’s Word is the only presupposition that does not destroy the intelligibility of human thought.

Hence Frame’s application:

Because of Van Til, we can at last define the essential philosophical differences between the Christian and the non-Christian worldviews.

If Kant’s achievement makes him the most important secular philosopher of modern times, should we not say that Van Til’s achievement makes him the most important Christian thinker of modern times?

—John M. Frame, Cornelius Van Til: An Analysis of His Thought (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R, 1995), pp. 44-47.

For those who want to see what this form of apologetics looks like in action, you may want to check out the 1985 debate between Greg Bahnsen and Gordon Stein. You can read a transcript of the two-hour debate here, listen to the MP3, or listen to all of it through YouTube after the jump:

BTW, The Great Debate is a debate that all Christians should listen to, it is one of my favorites.

Here is a link to a classic Van Til book called, “The Calvinistic Concept of Culture.” – HERE (Thanks to the Domain for Truth).

X-Mas or Christmas? A little history…

From R.C. Sproul’s ligonier blog:

The X in Christmas is used like the R in R.C. My given name at birth was Robert Charles, although before I was even taken home from the hospital my parents called me by my initials, R.C., and nobody seems to be too scandalized by that.

X can mean so many things. For example, when we want to denote an unknown quantity, we use the symbol X. It can refer to an obscene level of films, something that is X-rated. People seem to express chagrin about seeing Christ’s name dropped and replaced by this symbol for an unknown quantity X. Every year you see the signs and the bumper stickers saying, “Put Christ back into Christmas” as a response to this substitution of the letter X for the name of Christ.

There’s no X in Christmas

First of all, you have to understand that it is not the letter X that is put into Christmas. We see the English letter X there, but actually what it involves is the first letter of the Greek name for Christ. Christos is the New Testament Greek for Christ. The first letter of the Greek word Christos is transliterated into our alphabet as an X. That X has come through church history to be a shorthand symbol for the name of Christ.

We don’t see people protesting the use of the Greek letter theta, which is an O with a line across the middle. We use that as a shorthand abbreviation for God because it is the first letter of the word Theos, the Greek word for God.

X has a long and sacred history

The idea of X as an abbreviation for the name of Christ came into use in our culture with no intent to show any disrespect for Jesus. The church has used the symbol of the fish historically because it is an acronym. Fish in Greek (ichthus) involved the use of the first letters for the Greek phrase “Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior.” So the early Christians would take the first letter of those words and put those letters together to spell the Greek word for fish. That’s how the symbol of the fish became the universal symbol of Christendom. There’s a long and sacred history of the use of X to symbolize the name of Christ, and from its origin, it has meant no disrespect.

Many more questions are answered in R.C. Sproul’s Now, That’s a Good Question!

Excerpt has been adapted.
©1996 by R.C. Sproul. Used by permission of Tyndale.

Practical Advice for Families Who Don’t Do Santa [from the archive]

Thabiti has some great thoughts for families who don’t do Santa at their house. I cherish this because we have three kids under the age of three at our house, and we don’t do the whole Santa thing. This was helpful, Thabiti writes:

1. Prepare your children before they’re in the situation. In general, I fall down on this way too much. Too much of my instruction comes after the fact. Consequently, it’s damage control or re-directing rather than insulating equipping. So, I’d encourage us all who avoid Santa to talk with our children about why we choose not to, giving them a sense of the superior joy of focusing on Jesus. And talk with them about the fact that many, many others–both Christians and non-Christians–do include Santa Claus in their Christmas celebrations. Be sure to explain that doing Santa doesn’t make a person a bad Christian, but that you think Jesus and the gospel are clearer without Santa. And part of our preparation, should be a little role play or instruction on how to respond when they’re asked things like, “What do you want Santa to bring you for Christmas?” When I used to train people on interviewing techniques, we used to teach people to think of the questions they would like not to be asked and decide how they’re going to answer them if they come up. That principle works here I think.

2. Don’t leave your children hanging; model the response you’re hoping for. Invariably, there will be that neighbor or friend who sees you in the grocery store and turns to ask that awkward question of your child. They’ll mean well and will do a pretty good job of engaging the child directly… bending down to eye level, smiling, and giving all kinds of joyful non-verbal encouragements. (We should engage children like this all the time, really). Your child will look at this smiling giant and then look to mom and dad with a silent plea, What do I do now! You’re the one leading this thing! Say something!

So, we should say something. Graciously, with a smile, bring the conversation back to adult-to-adult. And say something like, “At Christmas, we enjoy focusing on the birth of Jesus and what it means to the world?” Hopefully, that opens some opportunity to explain what it means. If your child is old enough and familiar with the gospel, you might even relieve the tension by turning to the child and asking, “Why did Jesus come? And what does that mean for the world?” But the point here is to encourage the parents to lead with a little modeling. We’re not out for Santa fights in the produce aisle of the supermarket. So, aim for something short, winsome, and simple so your child can emulate it.

3. Teach children to take an interest in the traditions of others.We can go on the “offensive” here as well. We should teach our children not to be in a defensive posture about Christmas celebrations, but to be in that people-seeking, gospel-communicating, offensive posture of the Great Commission. So, it’s good if we’re the ones teaching our children that people celebrate differently–some of that is cultural and ethnic, some of it is just preference. Some of it is well thought-out and reasoned, some of it is just cultural response. We can show genuine interest in people by asking what kinds of things they do to celebrate Christmas, and by asking how they came to embrace those practices. We learn about others and we hopefully deepen a relationship.

4. Finally, we have to teach our children how to handle objections. Well-meaning people, after hearing that you don’t do Santa Claus, will assume that means you don’t do joy at Christmas. They’ll assume you don’t give gifts or that you’re robbing the children. And they’ll sometimes give voice to these objections by asking the child something like, “Aren’t you gonna miss out on Santa and all the gifts?”

Here, we need to know two things. First, we need to know if our children are missing those things or longing for them. To what extent is materialism creeping into their hearts? Talking with them about this is helpful for us as parents apart from simply preparing for these kinds of conversations. And if they admit to struggling in this way, it’s an opportunity to do a little heart work with our children.

Second, we need to know if our children are prepared to respond in situations like this. These kinds of questions are actually a lot of pressure to put on a 3-, 4-, or 5-year olds. Answering towering adults who obviously disagree with you can be intimidating. So, again, we should be ready to step in and model a response. But we should also teach children how to handle objections and disagreements. Learning short answers can be helpful:

Q: “Won’t you miss all the presents?” Ans: “The best present comes from God in Jesus. That’s what we enjoy most.”

Q: “What will you do when the other children have lots of new toys?” Ans: “Share their joy with them, and continue to enjoy all the toys I already have.”

Q: “What’s wrong with believing in Santa?” Ans: “Others can. But I think it’s better to believe in real things that are wonderful and beautiful, like Jesus.”

Q: “Well, what do you do for Christmas then?” Ans: Fill in whatever your family does.

Whenever the child answers an objection graciously, joyfully, and honestly, affirm them. Join in by saying, “Yeah, that’s right. We….” Again, don’t leave them alone. Model how to respond and model that it’s a family tradition. Lord willing, that’ll pay off when they’re one day defending the gospel itself and sticking together with the family of faith.

Our Van Donald Trump Style.



This is the SMALLER version of our van. I already have plans to make ours like this when spilt apple juice and puke are no longer issues…

source

iPhone SLR?





Still conceptual, but is being designed for the iPhone 5. Very #NerdStrong.

source

Together for Adoption Audio.

The @t4acon conference audio is up. Go check it out and share it with your friends and church!

Main Sessions:

The Gospel, the Church, and Social Justice (Darrin Patrick)
Adoption and the Giving God (Dan Cruver)
The Church as the Theater of Transracial Adoption (Bryan Loritts)
Gospel-Motivation for Missional Living (Jeff Vanderstelt)
Relaxing in Trinitarian Love (Tim Chester)

More audio from the breakout sessions can be found here.

Sydney’s Grace – A Must Read.

If you’re going to read any post of mine this week or in the next few weeks you should read this one. Some of our friends still birthed their daughter 4 years ago. In their post they share about their suffering, God’s grace, the Gospel and how all this lead up to them now pursing adoption.

Ian is our drummer at church and used to be in this band called Soular, no doubt he’s the best drummer you will have a chance to listen to… I sincerely mean that. Anyways, he has been working on “Sydney’s song” for quite some time and it’s finally ready. The cool thing about it is that they are giving all the proceeds to help families adopt from our church. You can listen to the song here:

Here are some of the thoughts shared on their post, but you can read the whole thing HERE.

For some time after Sydney died, Ian and I each chose to grieve differently. One out loud and publicly and the other keeping it inside. And then Ian heard music. In his head, it would not leave. He began losing sleep and driving himself crazy with this heaven sent tune. He could not get it out of his head. That melody. Unending. And in the beginning, we weren’t ready or able to say Hallelujah and truly mean it…Hallelujah for death? Of a sweet little baby? How could that be?

Two years later, Ian began putting this “head music” together in the form of a song. Collecting sweet talented friends of ours. asking me to write the lyrics. Adding this year long melody with his amazing talents on the drums and in a large group effort with many we love, he began crafting Sydney’s Song. A song that Ian felt was about her. Her life and death and it’s impact on us. A song that would help him heal and move forward in restoration and reconciling his little girl’s death to a good God. Over that 3rd year, Ian began to see how Sydney’s Song was not supposed to be about her as much as it was to be about the One who ordained all of her days and how it was He that would bring the healing, not just songwriting, to him. Ian shared with me these thoughts and we both agreed that we needed to rework the song. I rewrote the lyrics, kept some of the original but we both agreed this song would be a praise song, not just a lament one. A worshipFULL song, not just a mourning one. And most importantly, this song was God’s. Not Ian’s. Not ours, not even hers. But God’s song. For Him and about Him and what He does with grief battered torn up hearts because of death.

Because of the death of a little girl. Because of the death of a Savior and ultimately the death of our own sin at the Cross…

…………………………………………………………………………..

God takes disgusting ugly death and transforms it into beauty, into restoration and reconciles it.. through the Cross, because of a Savior, eternal life, the end of sin in heaven? Yes!!! But also here. On earth and in hearts that walk in the now not yet season…He can take the bad, the painful and the sad and renew it and transform it into a thing of Grace that solely brings glory to Himself. All the while, drawing others to Him.

…………………………………………………………………………..

We are joyfully glad and proud to announce that we have answered the call to adoption. Our journey to this point has been a long one, a painful one, a life changing one, and a God focused one. This is not plan B for us simply because we can’t have anymore kids. This is God’s plan A for our family. It always was. We are certain, that our family is called to care, serve, love and bring a home to one of His fatherless children. To make things right? No. To replace her? No. Never. Because we cannot have anymore children biologically? No. Simply because that is gospel is why.

“Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you.” 
James 1:27 

To love and care for his orphans is the most beautiful image of gospel love, of redeeming love and restoring love. And life changing love and heart transforming love. We want to be a part of that and help others that are passionate about it’s message as well! We might not have walked this path had we not lost our Sydney. Or maybe we would have, only God knows..Death did teach us about God’s restorative love though. And adoption is restorative love at it’s finest..Just as God adopted us into His heavenly family, we chose adoption here on earth…I do know we can say that our sweet baby girl’s life and death has influenced and shaped our hearts, as we in our loss, reach out in love to bring a fourth child into our family, a precious child that has experienced it’s own loss as well. We long to reconcile that hurt and loss of theirs and have God redeem it by uniting us all as a family.

“Father to the fatherless, defender of widows — this is God, whose dwelling is holy. God places the lonely in families.” 
Psalms 68:5-6 

Free e-Book from Piper.

My friends at Logos asked that I share a little gift they are giving out this Christmas season.

For Christmas we at Logos Bible Software are offering customers A Holy Ambiton by John Piper for free, exclusively on Vyrso (Logos new Christian ebookstore).

 http://vyr.so/tEd4Du

Enjoy, and Merry Christmas!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.