Comments for BRYANLOPEZ.COM

Comment on My Only Post For This Week – Baby Brianna. Watch. by Michelle V.

Michelle V. — Sun, 25 Jul 2010 01:23:33 +0000

Little sweet girl, I wish that you have found peace and are no longer in pain.

Comment on What is a Presupposition? by SLIMJIM

SLIMJIM — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:10:58 +0000

Ah, nice to see what Steve Hays have to say! He is quite thoughtful

Comment on Free Lectures on Introductory Logic. by SLIMJIM

SLIMJIM — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:51:35 +0000

Definitely, will let you know brother!

Comment on Free Lectures on Introductory Logic. by bryanclopez

bryanclopez — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:19:58 +0000

Jim,

It’s a great read. It’s one of those must haves for your library. Let me know what you think of it.

Comment on Free Lectures on Introductory Logic. by SLIMJIM

SLIMJIM — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:29:14 +0000

Wonderful material! I’m planning to read Gordon Clark’s book on logic in a few weeks or so…

Comment on Preview John Frame’s “Doctrine of the Word of God.” by bryanclopez

bryanclopez — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 23:18:16 +0000

As soon as I saw this I thought Schnee is going to freak. Enjoy bud… We still need to get together. Miss you bro.

Comment on Preview John Frame’s “Doctrine of the Word of God.” by GregS

GregS — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 23:08:09 +0000

Daddy like. Nice find B. I appreciate you posting this.

Comment on Some Black Eyed Peas Love for Friday. by bryanclopez

bryanclopez — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:33:58 +0000

I agree, shoes are neat.

Comment on Some Black Eyed Peas Love for Friday. by josiah jensen

josiah jensen — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:02:15 +0000

I’m impressed, both by the music and shoe collection.

Comment on Reformed Objection to Natural Theology. by bryanclopez

bryanclopez — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:09:44 +0000

M.S.

I think you are correct when stating that God uses the means of order as an avenue for revelation, but most reformers would state that (please note that I do not take it this far) this violates the Sola Scriptura principle.

One thing to note is that there is a dualistic dynamic to natural theology. First, being, the logic that states God can be understood by philosophic reason. The dilemma with this is it does not take in account illumination or scripture, and the traditional definition’s logical conclusion is that neither of the two are required. The second dynamic is that God reveals his divine character in nature. I would state that nature is “a” means for divine revelation not “the” ultimate source… that’s where I differ from the “old” reformed perspective….

With that dualistic understanding I end up taking a portion of it and modifying it… make sense?