Pro Ecclesia: For the Church – Mike Horton.
October 16, 2009 at 5:22 pm | Posted in Chruch, Reformed Theology | Leave a CommentIf you’ve been in Protestant circles for very long, whether conservative or liberal, you may have heard the phrase “reformed and always reforming” or sometimes just “always reforming.” I hear it a lot these days, especially from friends who want our Reformed churches to be more open to moving beyond the faith and practice that is confessed in our doctrinal standards. Even in Reformed circles of late, various movements have arisen that challenge these standards. How can confessions and catechisms written in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries guide our doctrine, life, and worship in the twenty-first? Liberal Protestants frequently invoked this phrase to justify their captivity to the spirit of the age, but some conservative Protestants also use it to encourage a broader definition of what it means to be Reformed.
But where did this phrase come from? Its first appearance was in a 1674 devotional by Jodocus van Lodenstein, who was an important figure in Dutch Reformed pietism — a movement known as the Dutch Second Reformation. According to these writers, the Reformation reformed the doctrine of the church, but the lives and practices of God’s people always need further reformation.
Van Lodenstein and his colleagues were committed to the teaching of the Reformed confession and catechism; they simply wanted to see that teaching become more thoroughly applied as well as understood. However, here is his whole phrase: “The church is reformed and always [in need of] being reformed according to the Word of God.” The verb is passive: the church is not “always reforming,” but is “always being reformed” by the Spirit of God through the Word. Although the Reformers themselves did not use this slogan, it certainly reflects what they were up to; that is, if one quotes the whole phrase!
Each clause is crucial. First, the church is Reformed, and this should be written with a capitalized “R.” If it is true that Jesus rose from the dead two millennia ago in Palestine, then it is just as true in our time and place. The ecumenical creeds confess the faith that we all share across a multitude of cultures and eras. Similarly, the Reformed standards (such as the Three Forms of Unity and the Westminster Confession and Catechisms) summarize what Reformed Christians believe to be the clear teaching of God’s Word. Churches will always be changing in significant ways depending on their time and place, but these communal ways of confessing Christ remain faithful summaries of “the faith once and for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3).
Our forebears who invoked this phrase had in mind the consolidation of catholic and evangelical Christianity embodied in the Reformed confessions and catechisms. There is a reason that this wing of the Reformation called itself “Reformed.” Unlike the Anabaptists, Reformed churches understood themselves as a continuing branch of the catholic church. At the same time, the Reformed wanted to reform everything “according to the Word of God.” Not only our doctrine but our worship and life must be determined by Scripture and not by human whim or creativity.
Interestingly, it is a mainline Presbyterian theologian, Anna Case-Winters, who brings attention to what she calls “our misused motto.” Winters points out that “in the 16th-century context the impulse it reflected was neither liberal nor conservative, but radical, in the sense of returning to the ‘root.’” This was reflected in the rallying cry, sola Scriptura (by Scripture alone). The Reformation had no interest in “change” as an end in itself. As Calvin argued in his treatise “The Necessity of Reforming the Church,” the Reformers were charged with innovation when in fact it was the medieval church’s innovative distortions of Christian faith and worship that required a recovery of apostolic Christianity. Rome pretended to be “always the same,” but it had accumulated a host of doctrines and practices that were unknown to the ancient church, much less to the New Testament.
Some people today leave out the “Reformed” part or at least interpret it as “reformed” (little “r”): the church is “always being reformed according to the Word of God.” This means that to be Reformed is simply to be reformed and to be reformed is simply to be biblical. All who base their beliefs on the Bible are therefore “reformed,” regardless of whether their interpretations are consistent with the common confessions of the Reformed churches. However, this runs counter to the original intention of the phrase. Doubtless there are many beliefs and practices that Reformed believers share in common with non-Reformed believers committed to God’s Word. We must always remain open to correction from our brothers and sisters in other churches who have interpreted the Bible differently. Nevertheless, Reformed churches belong to a particular Christian tradition with its own definitions of its faith and practice. We believe that our confessions and catechisms faithfully represent the system of doctrine found in Holy Scripture. We believe that to be Reformed is not only to be biblical; to be biblical is to be Reformed. As important as it is to keep “Reformed” in the phrase, an even more dangerous omission is often found among more liberal Protestants who also leave out the “according to the Word of God” clause. And usually it is “always reforming,” instead of “always being reformed.” In this view, the church is the active party, determining its own doctrine, worship, and discipline in the light of ever-changing cultural contexts. Progressivism becomes an end in itself and the church becomes a mirror of the world.
They Met at Their Peril
June 10, 2009 at 6:44 am | Posted in Chruch, Gospel | Leave a CommentMatt posts some great thoughts from Wells:
“When Christianity becomes churchless [they say], it is able to fly under the radar of hostile opposing religions and ideologies because it has become invisible. This offers the enormous boon of providing a way for people to be Christian and to avoid all the persecution that would otherwise come their way. They simply are unknown in their believing.
It is an ingenious proposal, but sadly it suffers from a defect: it violates the biblical norm. God’s people should not neglect ‘to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another’ (Heb. 10:25). Indeed, it is striking to note that in many cases in the New Testament, God’s blessing came, not simply in private moments, but when people were gathered together (E.g., Acts 2:1; 4:31; 10:44). They obviously met at their peril, but meet they did. And it was in their company that outsiders saw the reality of God’s redemption at work.”
[David Wells, The Courage to Be Protestant, 216]
No Shorts for Christians.
February 3, 2009 at 6:15 am | Posted in Chruch, Sports | 10 CommentsOne of the funniest things I have read to date. Props to Erik for finding this one….
ESPN recently featured some of the embarrassing cousins within the church family. They ran a story about a tiny Pentecostal High School in Virginia who require their basketball teams to wear long pants on the court. No, not just during warm ups, but the whole game.
ESPN has a guy who keeps up to date with the various uniform trends within sports. The writings are typically interesting and funny. In this case, at least for me, not funny. Though I’m sure the rest of the audience enjoyed the feature displaying Christians as painfully weird.
The kicker in this story is in the interview. Watch the flow:
ESPN: A basketball team wearing long pants is new to me. What’s it all about?
Principal Wayne Elliott: We’re a small Christian school, about 52 kids, and it’s just a school dress code that we have, based on our Biblical beliefs and standards. It goes back to dressing in modest apparel — that’s the dress code we set, and the kids abide by it here at the school and at all school functions.
ESPN: And that code would be “no short pants.”
WE: Correct.
ESPN: Please forgive my ignorance on this point, but is there a specific verse of the Bible that addresses this?
WE: There is, but I’d have to look it up — I don’t have it handy, but it’s definitely in Scripture.
First of all, I love how the ESPN guy goes to the Bible for his authority. The principal should have done the same. He then fumbles the question and tosses up a half-court-prayer-shot, “There is, but I’d have to look it up — I don’t have it handy, but it’s definitely in Scripture”
Actually, Wayne, its not. There is not a Bible verse that tells men that they can’t wear shorts or that they have to wear matching short sleeve shirts under their tank tops. If you are a legalist you should at least have your out of context verses handy.
But it gets worse.
Principal Wayne then goes on, almost bragging, that the girls basketball team wears “skirts” and the cheerleaders wear “long skirts”.
I don’t know if Wayne has noticed this before but the ’skirts’ that girls wear are actually shorter than most men’s basketball shorts. But they want the girls to look like girls (never mind showing off the skin that they so ardently oppose with the boys’ team).
We should just make things easier. The boys should wear snowsuits and mittens and the girls can wear burkhas. This will prevent any questions.
What is so sad is that this school is training their students and the watching world that godliness is gained by what you wear or do not wear.
As if this was all that it took.
What gets lost in this whole discussion is that God came in the flesh and earned a righteous standing before God for his people and he died to pay the death penalty that his people had earned from their sin. This is the basis for standing before God. This is the basis and the means for godliness.
If the good principal would survey the Bible for his phantom verses that tell kids to wear pants when they play hoops he may stumble across a major New Testament theme: Christ has delivered his people from the weak and worthless elementary things of this world! What you wear or do not wear is not you basis for standing or godliness before God but rather what Christ did or did not do. To turn aside to these things as a basis before God (demonstrated by their obligation here) is to turn away from Christ. Paul makes the point in Galatians 4.8-11 that to do this is to turn away from Jesus and turn to Paganism.
You look so pious and religious in your long pants. People are impressed. In the midst of a litany against such false thinking Paul writes:
“These are matters which have, to be sure, the appearance of wisdom in self-made religion and self-abasement and severe treatment of the body, but are of no value against fleshly indulgence.” (Col 2.23)
It is all show. It doesn’t work. It actually distracts from the gospel, veils Christ’s work, confuses the unbelieving world, and exalts your own ability to earn and keep God’s favor.
If Christians are to be laughed at for something (and we should be) let it be our view of the Bible, our understanding of God, our relentless trust in Christ, or our proclamation of the gospel! But don’t let it be these whacy hermenuitics that promote rocking the fundi-wear pants for boys and the hoop skirts for girls.
Tithing Stats in America.
April 22, 2008 at 4:05 am | Posted in Chruch, Ecclesia | Leave a CommentTags: church, donations, giving, stats, tithing
ThinkChristian put up this post last week and I found it quite interesting in light of our current depletion in tithing funds at the church I work at…. What do you think?
Everybody’s favorite polling group, Barna, has released their tithing numbers for 2007. Short story: not too many people tithe in the United States.
Whether they believe in the principle of tithing or not, few Americans give away that much money. In 2007, the research revealed that just 5% of adults tithed.Not surprisingly, some population groups were more likely than others to have given away at least ten percent of their income. Among the most generous segments were evangelicals (24% of whom tithed); conservatives (12%); people who had prayed, read the Bible and attended a church service during the past week (12%); charismatic or Pentecostal Christians (11%); and registered Republicans (10%).
Several groups also stood out as highly unlikely to tithe: people under the age of 25, atheists and agnostics, single adults who have never been married, liberals, and downscale adults. One percent or less of the people in each of those segments tithed in 2007.
Among all born again adults, 9% contributed one-tenth or more of their income. The study also showed that Protestants were four times as likely to tithe as were Catholics (8% versus 2%, respectively).
Tithing Since 2000
The percentage of adults who tithe has stayed constant since the turn of the decade, falling in the 5% to 7% range. The Barna tracking reported that the proportion of adults who tithed was 7% in 2006 and 2005; 5% in 2004 and 2003; 6% in 2002; and 5% in 2001.
The following quotation by Barna mirrors how I’ve seen in my own giving recently. Namely, rather than giving exclusively to a local church Americans are giving directly to other ministries and charities.
“Born again adults remain the most generous givers in a country acknowledged to be the most generous on the planet,” said the veteran researcher. “But their donation decisions must be seen in the larger context of the changes occurring in a wide range of religious behaviors. With millions of people shifting their allegiance to different forms of church experience, and a more participatory society altering how people interact and serve others, many Christians are now giving their money to different types of organizations instead of a church. They attend conventional churches less often. They are expanding their circle of Christian relationships beyond local church boundaries. And they are investing greater amounts of their time and money in service organizations that are not connected with a conventional church. That doesn’t make such giving inappropriate or less significant, it’s just a different way of addressing social needs.”
“The choices being made by born again donors have huge implications for the non-profit sector. Realize that a majority of the money donated by individuals in the U.S. comes from the born again constituency,” Barna pointed out. “If this transition in the perceptions and giving behavior of born again adults continues to accelerate, the service functions of conventional churches will be redefined within the next eight to ten years, and conventional churches will have to adopt new ways of assisting people in need.”
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
ESPN
I don’t know if Wayne has noticed this before but the ’skirts’ that girls wear are actually shorter than most men’s basketball shorts. But they want the girls to look like girls (never mind showing off the skin that they so ardently oppose with the boys’ team).
If the good principal would survey the Bible for his phantom verses that tell kids to wear pants when they play hoops he may stumble across a major New Testament theme: Christ has delivered his people from the weak and worthless elementary things of this world! What you wear or do not wear is not you basis for standing or godliness before God but rather what Christ did or did not do. To turn aside to these things as a basis before God (demonstrated by their obligation here) is to turn away from Christ. Paul makes the point in Galatians 4.8-11 that to do this is to turn away from Jesus and turn to Paganism.
Whether they believe in the principle of tithing or not, few Americans give away that much money. In 2007, the research revealed that just 5% of adults tithed.Not surprisingly, some population groups were more likely than others to have given away at least ten percent of their income. Among the most generous segments were evangelicals (24% of whom tithed); conservatives (12%); people who had prayed, read the Bible and attended a church service during the past week (12%); charismatic or Pentecostal Christians (11%); and registered Republicans (10%).


