Let God be God – A Theology of Trust – Sproul
December 14, 2009 at 4:53 am | Posted in Faith, Martin Luther, Practical Theology, Prayer, Sovereignty, Theology | Leave a CommentR.C. has these encouraging words. I needed this today!
When inexplicable disasters occur, we must say with Luther, “Let God be God.”
When Job cried out, “The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord” (Job 1:21b), he was not trying to sound pious or give superficial praise to God. He was biting his lip and gripping his stomach as he sought to remain faithful to God in the midst of unmitigated anguish. But Job knew who God was and cursed Him not.
Whatever else this world is, it is fallen. Suffering is inseparably related to sin. That is not to say that all suffering is a direct result of sin or that there is a measurable ratio between an individual’s suffering and his sin (Job and John 9 militate against such thinking). However, suffering belongs to the complex of sin. As long as this world suffers from the violence of men, it returns such violence in kind. Scripture often personifies nature as being angry with its human master and exploiter. Instead of dressing, keeping, and replenishing the earth, we exploit it and pollute it.
The world is not yet redeemed. We look for a new heaven and a new earth. We yearn for a land without tempest, flood, or earthquake. Such yearning provides a hope that is an anchor for the soul.
Coram Deo: Is your soul anchored to the biblical hope of the future, the new heaven and earth, where there will be no more sin and suffering?
John 9:1–3: “Now as Jesus passed by, He saw a man who was blind from birth. And His disciples asked Him, saying, ‘Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?’ Jesus answered, ‘Neither this man nor his parents sinned, but that the works of God should be revealed in him.’” – R.C. Sproul
25 Free Christmas Songs from Amazon!
December 11, 2009 at 7:08 am | Posted in Freebies | Leave a CommentTags: Free Christmas Songs, Free Music Downloads
Practical advice for families who don’t do Santa.
December 11, 2009 at 6:44 am | Posted in Family, Practical Theology | 2 CommentsTags: Christmas, No Santa, Santa
Thabiti has some great thoughts for families who don’t do Santa at their house. I cherish this because we have three kids under the age of three at our house, and we don’t do the whole Santa thing. This was helpful, Thabiti writes:
1. Prepare your children before they’re in the situation. In general, I fall down on this way too much. Too much of my instruction comes after the fact. Consequently, it’s damage control or re-directing rather than insulating equipping. So, I’d encourage us all who avoid Santa to talk with our children about why we choose not to, giving them a sense of the superior joy of focusing on Jesus. And talk with them about the fact that many, many others–both Christians and non-Christians–do include Santa Claus in their Christmas celebrations. Be sure to explain that doing Santa doesn’t make a person a bad Christian, but that you think Jesus and the gospel are clearer without Santa. And part of our preparation, should be a little role play or instruction on how to respond when they’re asked things like, “What do you want Santa to bring you for Christmas?” When I used to train people on interviewing techniques, we used to teach people to think of the questions they would like not to be asked and decide how they’re going to answer them if they come up. That principle works here I think.
2. Don’t leave your children hanging; model the response you’re hoping for. Invariably, there will be that neighbor or friend who sees you in the grocery store and turns to ask that awkward question of your child. They’ll mean well and will do a pretty good job of engaging the child directly… bending down to eye level, smiling, and giving all kinds of joyful non-verbal encouragements. (We should engage children like this all the time, really). Your child will look at this smiling giant and then look to mom and dad with a silent plea, What do I do now! You’re the one leading this thing! Say something!
So, we should say something. Graciously, with a smile, bring the conversation back to adult-to-adult. And say something like, “At Christmas, we enjoy focusing on the birth of Jesus and what it means to the world?” Hopefully, that opens some opportunity to explain what it means. If your child is old enough and familiar with the gospel, you might even relieve the tension by turning to the child and asking, “Why did Jesus come? And what does that mean for the world?” But the point here is to encourage the parents to lead with a little modeling. We’re not out for Santa fights in the produce aisle of the supermarket. So, aim for something short, winsome, and simple so your child can emulate it.
3. Teach children to take an interest in the traditions of others.We can go on the “offensive” here as well. We should teach our children not to be in a defensive posture about Christmas celebrations, but to be in that people-seeking, gospel-communicating, offensive posture of the Great Commission. So, it’s good if we’re the ones teaching our children that people celebrate differently–some of that is cultural and ethnic, some of it is just preference. Some of it is well thought-out and reasoned, some of it is just cultural response. We can show genuine interest in people by asking what kinds of things they do to celebrate Christmas, and by asking how they came to embrace those practices. We learn about others and we hopefully deepen a relationship.
4. Finally, we have to teach our children how to handle objections. Well-meaning people, after hearing that you don’t do Santa Claus, will assume that means you don’t do joy at Christmas. They’ll assume you don’t give gifts or that you’re robbing the children. And they’ll sometimes give voice to these objections by asking the child something like, “Aren’t you gonna miss out on Santa and all the gifts?”
Here, we need to know two things. First, we need to know if our children are missing those things or longing for them. To what extent is materialism creeping into their hearts? Talking with them about this is helpful for us as parents apart from simply preparing for these kinds of conversations. And if they admit to struggling in this way, it’s an opportunity to do a little heart work with our children.Second, we need to know if our children are prepared to respond in situations like this. These kinds of questions are actually a lot of pressure to put on a 3-, 4-, or 5-year olds. Answering towering adults who obviously disagree with you can be intimidating. So, again, we should be ready to step in and model a response. But we should also teach children how to handle objections and disagreements. Learning short answers can be helpful:
Q: “Won’t you miss all the presents?” Ans: “The best present comes from God in Jesus. That’s what we enjoy most.”
Q: “What will you do when the other children have lots of new toys?” Ans: “Share their joy with them, and continue to enjoy all the toys I already have.”
Q: “What’s wrong with believing in Santa?” Ans: “Others can. But I think it’s better to believe in real things that are wonderful and beautiful, like Jesus.”
Q: “Well, what do you do for Christmas then?” Ans: Fill in whatever your family does.
Whenever the child answers an objection graciously, joyfully, and honestly, affirm them. Join in by saying, “Yeah, that’s right. We….” Again, don’t leave them alone. Model how to respond and model that it’s a family tradition. Lord willing, that’ll pay off when they’re one day defending the gospel itself and sticking together with the family of faith.
Geehardus Voss on The Love of God
December 10, 2009 at 11:01 am | Posted in Gospel, Love | 2 CommentsVoss:
The love of this gracious fatherhood is infinitely richer than that pertaining to the three other spheres previously mentioned. It would be wrong, of course, to keep them mechanically separated. For those who are to be received into the inner sanctuary the privileges of the court serve as a preparation. But whatever there is of organic adjustment between the sphere of nature and of the kingdom, between that of common and of special grace, between the love of compassion and the love of adoption, cannot justify us in identifying the one with the other. In our Lord’s teaching this is never done.6 So far as the actual manifestation of the love of God in human consciousness is concerned, a fundamental difference lies in this, that the enjoyment of the common love of God outside of thekingdom does not exempt man from being subject at the same time to the divine wrath on account of sin. Love and wrath here are not mutually exclusive. Within the circle of redemption, on the other hand, the enjoyment of the paternal love of God means absolute forgiveness and deliverance from all wrath. Even this, however, is not sufficient clearly to mark the distinction between these two kinds of love, the wider and the narrower. For, previously to the moment of believing, those who are appointed for salvation, no less than the others, are subject in their consciousness to the experience of the wrath of God. It would seem, therefore, that in his pre-Christian state the one who will later become a child of God is not differentiated from the one who never will, inasmuch as both are in an equal sense the objects of the general benevolence of God and of His wrath in their experience. Thus a representation would result as if the line of God’s general love ran singly up to the point of conversion, there to pass over into the line of His special love. The general love of God, as a common possession of all men, would then be the only factor to be reckoned with outside of the sphere of the kingdom; and a special love of God could be spoken of only with reference to those who have actually become His children. And on this standpoint the temptation would always be strong to view the special love as conditioned by the spiritual character of man, since it does not apply to any except the regenerate. In order to clear the subject thoroughly, therefore, we must note the further fact that, according to our Lord’s teaching, even before the divine wrath is lifted off the sinner at the moment of his believing, there exists alongside of the general benevolence which embraces all mankind a special affection in the heart of God for certain individuals, who are destined to become subsequently His children, and who are in their subjective consciousness as yet the objects of His wrath. Already during the pre-Christian state of the elect there are two lines, that of general and special love, running parallel in God’s disposition toward them. It is not the special love itself which originates at the moment of conversion, but only the subjective realization and enjoyment of it on the part of the sinner. The fourth Gospel, in which so many at present profess to find an indiscriminate universalism of the redemptive love of God, is the most emphatic on this point of all the New Testament writings, Paul alone excepted. Not merely is sovereign election taught here in unequivocal terms: it is also brought into organic connection with the love of God. Those who are appointed unto life are children and sheep of the fold antecedently to their acceptance of the gospel. They belong to the Father in a special sense, and in virtue of this ownership are given by Him to the Son. Because this special relation between the Father and them exists, the Son, who is in His whole appearance and activity the exact reproduction of the Father, chooses them out of the world, and makes them the objects of that High-priestly intercession from which the world is on principle excluded. Believers know that they love God, because He loved them first. And, what is strongest of all, in a context where the Savior dwells upon the Father’s love, which was His before the foundation of the world, He identifies the disciples with Himself even in this unique possession: “In order that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me” (17:23).
Geehardus Voss, “The Scriptural Doctrine of the Love of God,” The Presbyterian and Reformed Review13 (1902) : 24-26.
Meeting Your Compassion Child –
December 10, 2009 at 10:57 am | Posted in Gospel, Love, missions | Leave a CommentTags: Compassion International
JT writes:
A beautiful blog post by Molly Piper:
Child sponsorship has always seemed like a very safe way to help another person. Most of the time you never look them in the eye.
But today I met our family’s sponsored child. All the safe distance of sponsorship was completely obliterated. Now all the “ideas” of sponsorship were humanized into a six-year-old boy. His name is Hector.
Read—and watch—the whole thing.
HT: JT
Coffee that give’s more than a pick up!
December 9, 2009 at 6:14 am | Posted in Adoption, General, Love, Web | 1 Comment
Buy coffee off of our site and we get part of the proceeds! If you you are going to buy coffee anyways please please please buy it from here and help us get our sweet sweet babies home! The coffee is also fair trade, it’s a triple win, you get awesome coffee, the farmers get their fair share, and it will help us get our little ones home more quickly. Please get the word out, feel free to blog, tweet, post on facebook, scream from your front door, buy it as Christmas presents, order it for your office, ect. Here is our site: www.justlovecoffee.com/onebagatatime (yeah we are real clever like that). And Gray drinks this coffee, we bought some from our friends Lauren and Jamie and if you know us you know that my dear husband is picky when it comes to coffee! Thank you in advance!
Win a Baby Zoowon Blanket of YOUR choice + $10 off any blanket!
December 8, 2009 at 4:53 pm | Posted in Baby Zoowon | Leave a CommentOk friends, we are running a $10 off any blanket sale through Friday night. PLUS, you can win a free blanket of your choice just share this ad, post this to your blog, or follow us on twitter and email us at info@babyzoowon.com. Help us spread the word! Winner will be chosen Saturday. Merry Christmas!
Theology Terms Tuesday – Arguments for God’s Existence Part IV
December 8, 2009 at 9:41 am | Posted in Apologetics, Theistic Philosophy, Theological Terms, Theology | Leave a Comment
Anthropological argument
The anthropological (anthropos meaning “man”) argument is made on the basis of the condition of humanity, of mankind’s basic moral standards and the thread a search for a higher being. It is related to the cosmological and teleological arguments in that it if man has a yearning for God and a conscience when offending him, ostensibly these have their origin and cause in God and not in man. The argument was perhaps most famously posited by Blaise Pascal, who reasoned that it was better “bet” to believe in God than not to do so.
Ontological argument
“The ontological argument attempts to prove God’s existence through abstract reasoning alone. The argument is entirely a priori, i.e. it involves no empirical evidence at all. Rather, the argument begins with an explication of the concept of God, and seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of that concept alone.
“The argument is ingenious. It has the appearance of a linguistic trick, but it is a difficult task to say precisely what, if anything, is wrong with it. All forms of the argument make some association between three concepts: the concepts of God, of perfection, and of existence. Very roughly, they state that perfection is a part of the concept of God, and that perfection entails existence, and so that the concept of God entails God’s existence.”
The ontological argument was first formulated by Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109), one of the great medieval philosopher-theologians, in his Proslogium, Chapter 2. Anselm’s ontological argument rests on the identification of God as “that than which no greater can be conceived”. Once it is understood that God is that of which no greater can be conceived, Anselm suggests, it becomes evident that God must exist.
Descartes’ ontological argument
We have the idea of an infinitely perfect Being. Since we are finite, and everything around us is finite, the idea of an infinitely perfect Being could not have originated with us or with the nature around us. Therefore the idea of an infinitely perfect Being must have come from such a being – God.
Argument from desire
If and when we desire, we do so because what we desire exists prior to our desiring it. Religion at its basic level could be defined as a desire to please or appease a Supreme Being. Therefore this Supreme Being must exist.
“The Christian says, ‘Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists. A baby feels hunger: well, there is such a thing as food. A duckling wants to swim: well, there is such a thing as water. Men feel sexual desire: well, there is such a thing as sex. If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world. If none of my earthly pleasures satisfy it, that does not prove that the universe is a fraud. Probably earthly pleasures were never meant to satisfy it, but only to arouse it, to suggest the real thing. If that is so, I must take care, on the one hand, never to despise, or be unthankful for, these earthly blessings, and on the other, never to mistake them for the something else of which they are only a kind of copy, or echo, or mirage. I must keep alive in myself the desire for my true country, which I shall not find until after death; I must never let it get snowed under or turned aside; I must make it the main object of life to press on to that other country and to help others do the same.’” (C.S. Lewis)
No Sacrifice Too Great!
December 7, 2009 at 8:19 am | Posted in Love, Penal Substitution, Soteriology, Systematic Theology, missions | Leave a CommentWe don’t want to encourage violence, marginalize the gospel, or promote individualistic passivity. But I haven’t seen sinners who are gripped by Christ’s substitutionary death respond that way. Instead, I’ve more often observed responses like C.T. Studd’s famous statement: “If Jesus Christ be God, and died for me, then no sacrifice can be too great for me to make for him.” Charles Spurgeon put that point well: “It is our duty and our privilege to exhaust our lives for Jesus. We are not to be living specimens of men in fine preservation, but living sacrifices, whose lot is to be consumed.”
In C.J. Mahaney’s book Living the Cross Centered Life (Multnomah, 2006), he shares with us his advice to his young son, Chad” “This is what I hold out to my young son as the hope of his life: that Jesus, God’s perfect, righteous Son, died in his place for his sins. Jesus took all the punishment; Jesus received all the wrath as he hung on the Cross, so people like Chad and his sinful daddy could be completely forgiven.” Like Chad, we would do well to accept our guilt and admire God’s grace, to let the Holy Spirit encourage us by the Savior’s self-denying love to follow his example, and to savor God’s love to us in this almost incredible sacrifice. - Mark Dever
_______________
Dever, Mark. In My Place Condemned He Stood. Wheaton (Good News Publishers, 2007), 110.
Brett Favre / John Piper conspiracy.
December 4, 2009 at 11:44 am | Posted in Comical | 2 CommentsI’ve stumbled upon a conspiracy of epic proportions. Let me fill you in.
FACT: On February 11, 2009, Brett Favre announces his retirement from football season, saying that he is concerned about health risks and other various factors.
FACT: On April 30, 2009, John Piper releases a book entitled Rethinking Retirement.
FACT: John Piper lives in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
FACT: In May, 2009 Brett Favre begins to “rethink” his retirement. Maybe he doesn’t want to quit football. Or maybe he’s worried about wasting his life. He meets with Minnesota Vikings head coach Brad Childress to discuss playing for the Vikings.
FACT: The Vikings play in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
FACT: On August 19, 2009, Favre signs with Vikings, saying that he’s willing to take a “chance” with the Vikings.
All these facts lead to one obvious conclusion: John Piper convinced Brett Favre to play for the Vikings.
Rumor has it that other prominent evangelicals were also trying to win Favre to their team. Apparently Mark Driscoll had a book in the works entitled Death By Retirement, but Piper, who is capable of writing three books per week, got to Favre first.
Need further proof? Look at this picture of John Piper about to catch a pass thrown by Favre.

What implications does this have for next year? We’ll just have to see.
HT: Stephen
Baby Zoowon – 22 Volume Commentary Give Away Winner…
December 4, 2009 at 9:31 am | Posted in Baby Zoowon, Give Aways, John Calvin | Leave a CommentThanks to all 37 participants who entered, please keep spreading the word about Baby Zoowon. Now, the reason you are reading this post… and the winner is…..
Kelly Moore! Congratulations Kelly, I will be contacting you to arrange for you to get your 22 volumes of sweetness. Thanks to Baby Zoowon for making this happen!
An Update on Matt Chandler from his elders.
December 1, 2009 at 11:38 am | Posted in Prayer | Leave a CommentMatt will undergo surgery Friday afternoon
Pastor Matt Chandler will have surgery Friday afternoon to remove a tumor located in the frontal lobe of his brain. The surgery will be performed by Dr. David Barnett.
Dr. Barnett told Matt that he was positive about recovery but won’t know the full results until the surgery is performed. The doctor was uncertain about the malignancy of the tumor, and a biopsy will be performed as part of the surgery.
The outpouring of support and prayers from all over the world has been overwhelming to Matt and Lauren. Continue to pray and fast on behalf of the family. The church’s monthly prayer service will be Wednesday at 7 p.m. at the Highland Village, Denton and Dallas Northway worship centers. We encourage you to fast throughout that day and join us to pray that evening. If you cannot join us, pray wherever you are.
We continue to rest in the knowledge that Matt is in the sovereign hand of our heavenly Father who loves him immensely more than we can comprehend, and He alone understands the reasons for this trial. Along with your prayers, continue to give Matt and Lauren and their family time and space for their continued rest
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.





![Screen shot 2009-12-04 at [Dec 4] 1.55.20 PM](http://bryanclopez.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/screen-shot-2009-12-04-at-dec-4-1-55-20-pm.png?w=259&h=283)



