John Stott on the NT.
April 10, 2008 at 3:50 pm | Posted in Gospel, Theology | 1 CommentTags: Christ, Gospel, John Stott, New Testament
“The biblical historians were not historians in the modern sense, writing with scientific detachment. They were theologians too, writing from a divine perspective. They were not morally and spiritually neutral; they were deeply committed to God’s cause. The Old Testament history books were regarded as prophecy, and the four lives of Jesus are not biographies but gospels written by evangelists, who were bearing witness to Jesus. Consequently, they selected and arranged their material according to their theological purpose. Moreover, their purpose arose naturally – though also in God’s providence – from their temperament, their background and their God-given responsibilities to the people of God. Man and message were related to each other. It was no accident that Amos was the prophet of God’s justice, Isaiah of his sovereignty and Hosea of his love; or that Paul was the apostle of grace, James of works, John of love and Peter of hope; or that Luke, the only Gentile contributor to the New Testament, stressed the worldwide embrace of the gospel. The Holy Spirit communicated through each a distinctive and appropriate emphasis.”
John Stott, “Culture and the Bible,” in Authentic Christianity.
1 Comment »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.




Stott is great because he points us to the great Savior. His book “The Cross of Christ” is a classic which changed my life. I have it on my “Great Books” page. I also have Stott on my “Great LIves” page. Here is a link if you want to see what I say and share your thoughts:
http://anuncommongrace.wordpress.com/great-loves/
Blessings,
Darian
Comment by dpcpastor — February 23, 2009 #